Twitter
- @moogzy
It doesn't appear you can disable it from the client end (unless you uninstall Pulse). It's worse than employer asking for FB pw.2012/05/17 23:55 - @networkjanitor
If company owned equipment, that's fine (even wise). But they're marketing it for employees install it on their own gear.2012/05/17 23:15 - I like Juniper, but they're still pushing their Pulse for BYOD. Pulse allows employer to view employe's SMS, MMS, Photos on personal phone.2012/05/17 23:01
- Damnit. I'm going to miss dodgeball tonight.2012/05/17 16:39
- @pandom_
Sadly, I won't know for weeks/months if I passed :)2012/05/17 15:46 - 45 comments on NPIV/NPV article. There is way more comments than actual article now :)2012/05/17 15:40
- @moogzy
Ask Tony
Archives
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
Categories
- Ask Tony
- Buyer's Guide
- Editorial
- Feature Articles
- From The Mailing list
- In the Wild
- Industry News
- lbwiki updates
- Link Load Balancing
- Load Balancing 101
- Newcomer Series
- Notes from the publisher
- Performance
- Pontification
- Quick Guide
- Recycled
- Reviews
- Tech Notes
- Troubleshooting
- Uncategorized
- vendor annoucements
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Chris on Packet Pushers Podcast
- Joseph on Packet Pushers Podcast
- tony on They’re %@#$!ing Load Balancers
- Shrawan Kumar Patel on Survey Results
- FrintonBoy on They’re %@#$!ing Load Balancers
Archive for June, 2007
-
Death of Layer 4 Load Balancing
Posted on June 29, 2007 | No CommentsThe load balancing vendor Barracuda recently announced Layer 7 capabilities and SSL offloading/acceleration, and the open source vendor loadbalancer.org recently gave up their anti-Layer 7 stance (although they still state... -
Keeping Up
Posted on June 27, 2007 | No CommentsFairly often in my work, I come across and environment that can only be called “crusty”. Whether it’s a load balancer, server, or operating system, it’s not an environment that... -
A Market By Any Other Name…
Posted on June 21, 2007 | No CommentsThe great thing about inventing markets is that you get to name them. I’ve recently named the Enterprise (F5/Citrix) market the “Premium” market, and the SMB market (KEMP/Barracuda/Coyote Point) market... -
A Load Balancer By Any Other Name…
Posted on June 18, 2007 | 1 CommentRecently, I posed a question on the mailing list: What do you call these devices that balance load and possibly do all this other stuff? The reaction to such a... -
Anatomy of a Load Balancer Customer
Posted on June 14, 2007 | No CommentsThe profile of a customer in the budget value market and the profile of a customer in a premium market are substantially different in a number of ways. Premium Customer... -
Shark Fest
Posted on June 7, 2007 | No CommentsPlease indulge a little bravado machismo here, but this picture is very applicable to today’s topic. (BTW, I’m the second diver from the left). The load balancing/application markets are interesting...

